Open Questions

The FM description of electricity has reached a useful level of internal consistency, but some parts remain incomplete.

This is expected.

The purpose of this section is not to hide uncertainty, but to identify clearly where the model is strongest and where further work is still needed.

What is already clear

Several points now form a coherent picture:

electricity is treated as gradient-driven reorganization in FM
current is not a substance flowing through empty space
magnetism is the rotational aspect of the same reorganization
charging is the slow conversion of incoming electrical reorganization into new stable chemical structure
discharge is the reverse structural process
compatibility between structures determines whether interaction leads to attraction, repulsion, binding, or reorganization

These points can already support a unified qualitative description of many electrical phenomena.

What still needs refinement

Some parts of the model are still only partially developed.

1. The detailed structure of the electron

The electron is treated here as a stable vortex-like structure, but its exact internal geometry remains open.

Important unresolved questions include:

whether the structure is best described as a ring, helix, or a more complex vortex pattern
how its internal organization relates to polarity
how this structure produces the observed interface behavior in charge and magnetism

At present, the electron model is sufficient for qualitative reasoning, but not yet fully specified.

2. The exact origin of magnetic rotation

The model explains magnetism as the rotational aspect of the same current-driven reorganization.

What remains to be clarified more explicitly is:

why a directed reorganization must take a rotational form around a conductor
how that rotational organization arises geometrically in FM
how the resulting field structure should be described most precisely

The current picture is plausible and coherent, but can still be sharpened.

3. Quantitative rules for compatibility

The role of compatibility is central throughout this section.

Structures bind, repel, or reorganize depending on whether their interfaces can share FM coherently.

What is still needed is a more quantitative description of:

how compatibility is measured
how much reorganizational capacity a structure has
what determines thresholds for stability loss or transition

This becomes especially important for chemistry, induction, and high-field conditions.

4. Atomic and molecular geometry in FM terms

The present model gives a useful physical picture of why structures reorganize under changed gradients.

Still, more work is needed to explain in FM language:

why specific atoms support specific numbers of shared structures
why molecules take particular shapes
how these geometries follow from gradient structure and not only from imported chemical rules

The goal is not to discard chemistry, but to describe its regularities more physically.

5. The transition from conductor-bound structure to free electromagnetic propagation

The section on electromagnetic waves explains waves as self-propagating reorganizations of FM.

What still needs more development is the transition itself:

under what exact conditions guided current-organization becomes free propagation
how the linearly guided and rotationally organized structure continues beyond the conductor
how this transition should be visualized in the simplest FM-consistent way

6. Reorganization limits and overload

The idea that FM has a finite reorganizational capacity appears repeatedly:

in induction
in delayed response
in structural stability
in strong interactions

This concept is promising, but still incomplete.

Questions remain such as:

how reorganizational capacity should be defined
whether it is local, global, or both
how it sets limits for field response, chemical transitions, and structural collapse

Why these questions remain open

Open questions do not mean that the model has failed.

They indicate where a qualitative physical picture has been reached, but where a deeper or more exact description is still needed.

In many cases, the present FM model already gives a more intuitive mechanical picture than standard descriptions, even before all details are complete.

How this section should be read

The material in this Electricity section should therefore be read as:

a coherent working model
physically motivated rather than purely formal
strongest in its unification of phenomena
still developing in its most detailed structural descriptions

The open questions identify where the next work belongs.

Final statement

FM already offers a unified logic for electricity, magnetism, induction, charging and electromagnetic propagation:

gradient → reorganization → structure → observable effect

What remains is to deepen the structural details, not to abandon the framework.

The model is therefore not presented as finished,
but as a developing physical description whose remaining questions are clearly visible.