top of page

Process Rate Mechanism

Resonance, cycle closure, and why clocks differ without time dilation

Purpose of this page

This page describes the physical mechanism underlying all process-rate effects used throughout the FM experiments.

It introduces:

  • no new data

  • no speculative assumptions

  • no untestable claims

It explains how rate differences arise using only:

  • resonance

  • coherent cycle closure

  • measurable physical processes

What a process rate is

A process rate is the rate at which a physical system completes coherent cycles.

  • A cycle is complete only when resonance conditions are satisfied

  • Partial or internal activity does not count

  • Only completed cycles are physically registered

Atomic clocks, particle decays, oscillators, and wave periods all follow this same structure.

Resonance and cycle closure

Resonance is the condition that allows a cycle to close coherently.

A system may:

  • contain intense internal activity

  • circulate energy internally

  • perform many intermediate operations

But no cycle is complete until:

  • phase coherence is restored

  • resonance with the surrounding medium is achieved

Cycle closure is the physical event that defines a tick.

Internal activity vs completed cycles

A key distinction:

Internal activity and completed cycles are not the same thing.

As physical demands increase (motion, gradients, rotation):

  • internal activity increases

  • more internal operations are required

  • cycles become harder to close

This leads to a reduction in completed cycles per comparison, even though internal dynamics continue uninterrupted.

This is what is observed as a reduced process rate.

Saturation and coherence limits

There exists a limit set by the medium’s ability to support coherent propagation.

As this limit is approached:

  • all available process capacity is used to maintain coherence

  • no surplus remains to close additional cycles

At saturation:

  • internal dynamics do not stop

  • activity does not freeze

  • but no new coherent cycles can complete

This is a coherence limit, not a prohibition of motion or energy.

Why the speed of light appears as a limit

In this framework:

  • the speed of light is not a limit on motion itself

  • it is the maximum speed at which coherent cycles can propagate and close

It marks the saturation point of:

  • compressional wave propagation

  • phase-locked resonance

  • coherent cycle completion

Beyond this, coherence fails — not existence.

No internal or external time

Because only completed cycles are counted:

  • there is no internal time

  • no external time

  • no observer-dependent time

All descriptions refer to the same physical events:

  • cycle closure

  • resonance loss

  • structural change

Internal activity between closures is real, but it is not time.

Relation to experiments

This single mechanism explains:

  • atomic clock rate differences

  • muon lifetime observations

  • signal delays near mass

  • phase shifts in rotating systems

  • coherence limits at high velocity

No separate mechanisms are introduced.

What this mechanism replaces

This description removes the need for:

  • time dilation as a physical effect

  • spacetime curvature as an active agent

  • observer-dependent time descriptions

  • length contraction as a physical mechanism

All effects arise from:

  • resonance conditions

  • cycle closure limits

  • interaction with a physical medium

Core statement

Physical time does not slow down.
Completed cycles become less frequent because coherence is harder to maintain.

The fundamental limit is not time or motion, but coherent cycle completion.

+47 90707600

  • Facebook
  • YouTube

Niels Juels gate 70A

0259 OSLO

Norway

FieldMedium™ – A physical model of space
Open research • Testable predictions • Transparent reasoning

FeltMedium® and FieldMedium™ are trademarks claimed by FieldMedium

All rights reserved. Unauthorized use is prohibited.

FieldMedium™ - A new way of looking at the universe 

In the previous video, we introduced the Field Medium Model and the idea that space itself is a physical medium.

In this video, we’ll look at motion — and why constant motion through such a medium costs nothing, while acceleration does.

bottom of page